首页> 外文OA文献 >Market feasibility of faecal sludge and municipal solid waste-based compost as measured by farmers’ willingness-to-pay for product attributes: evidence from Kampala, Uganda
【2h】

Market feasibility of faecal sludge and municipal solid waste-based compost as measured by farmers’ willingness-to-pay for product attributes: evidence from Kampala, Uganda

机译:根据农民对产品属性的支付意愿来衡量粪便污泥和城市固体废物堆肥的市场可行性:来自乌干达坎帕拉的证据

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

There is a great potential to close the nutrient recycling loop, support a ‘circular economy’ and improve cost recovery within the waste sector and to create viable businesses via the conversion of waste to organic fertilizers. Successful commercialization of waste-based organic fertilizer businesses however largely depends on a sound market. We used a choice experiment to estimate farmers’ willingness-to-pay (WTP) for faecal sludge and municipal solid waste-based (FSM) compost in Kampala, Uganda and considered three attributes—fortification, pelletization and certification. Our results reveal that farmers are willing to pay for FSM compost and place a higher value on a ‘certified’ compost product. They are willing to pay US $0.4 per kg above the current market price for a similar certified product, which is 67 times higher than the cost of providing the attribute. Farmers are willing to pay US $0.127 per kg for ‘pelletized’ FSM compost, which is lower (0.57 times) than the cost of providing the attribute. On the other hand, farmers require US $0.089 per kg as a compensation to use ‘fortified’ FSM compost. We suggest that future FSM compost businesses focus on a ‘certified and pelletized’ FSM product as this product type has the highest production cost–WTP differential and for which future businesses can capture the highest percentage of the consumer surplus. The demand for FSM compost indicates the benefits that can accrue to farmers, businesses and the environment from the recycling of organic waste for agriculture.
机译:关闭养分循环利用,支持“循环经济”并改善废物部门的成本回收以及通过将废物转化为有机肥料来创建可行的企业,具有巨大的潜力。然而,基于废物的有机肥料业务的成功商业化很大程度上取决于良好的市场。我们使用一项选择实验来估算农民在乌干达坎帕拉的粪便污泥和城市固体废物基堆肥的支付意愿(WTP),并考虑了强化,造粒和认证这三个属性。我们的结果表明,农民愿意为FSM堆肥支付费用,并愿意为“认证的”堆肥产品赋予更高的价值。他们愿意为当前的类似认证产品支付高于当前市场价格每公斤0.4美元的价格,这是提供该属性的成本的67倍。农民愿意为“粒状” FSM堆肥支付每公斤0.127美元,这比提供该特性的成本低(0.57倍)。另一方面,农民要求每公斤0.089美元作为使用“强化” FSM堆肥的补偿。我们建议未来的FSM堆肥业务将重点放在“认证和颗粒化”的FSM产品上,因为这种产品具有最高的生产成本(WTP差异),并且未来的业务可以获取最大的消费者剩余百分比。对FSM堆肥的需求表明,将有机废物用于农业回收可以给农民,企业和环境带来好处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号